2 Bewertungen von Mitarbeitern
2 Mitarbeiter haben diesen Arbeitgeber mit durchschnittlich 2,2 Punkten auf einer Skala von 1 bis 5 bewertet.
Keiner dieser Mitarbeiter hat den Arbeitgeber in seiner Bewertung weiterempfohlen.
Ihr Unternehmen?
Jetzt Profil vervollständigenIhr Unternehmen?
Jetzt Profil vervollständigen2 Mitarbeiter haben diesen Arbeitgeber mit durchschnittlich 2,2 Punkten auf einer Skala von 1 bis 5 bewertet.
Keiner dieser Mitarbeiter hat den Arbeitgeber in seiner Bewertung weiterempfohlen.
Alle Bewertungen durchlaufen den gleichen Prüfprozess - egal, ob sie positiv oder negativ sind. Im Zweifel werden Bewertende gebeten, einen Nachweis über ihr Arbeitsverhältnis zu erbringen.
international staff
lack of clear job responsibilities, lack of strategy, lack of decision making and of implementation, which all drive staff turn-over
change of business model and of management
constant high pressure, poor decision making, even poorer communication
no employer branding awareness
non-existing
lack of staff development programmes
depending on position and negotiation skills, no strict compensation policy
public transportation fees taken over by REEEP, general lack of energy-conscious behaviour despite business mission
depends on the team
poor
unreliability, volatile decision-making, incompetence, sometimes lack of trust, impolite and rude responses on more than one occasion
office building poorly maintained, worn-out offices, furniture, crammed with colleagues
many decision makers lack appreciation for staff
in many areas dominance of male decision makers, no specific support for females, no explicit diversity and inclusion policy
interesting, versatile, often over-stretching due to lack of clear responsibilities
mission, potentially interesting tasks
very difficult work environment, unclear structures and strategy make many good people leave. staff retention is definitely not a priority.
Chose better suited staff for management positions, create a clear strategy for the organisation and scrutinize why about half of the team has left in only around 1,5 years
the work atmosphere was initially very good but deteriorated a lot during the past few years - menawhile, some describe it as toxic. many staff members have left the organisation for this reason (although they previously loved their jobs).
the image is much better than what's behind the scenes
generally very high workload and many business trips, most employees have all-in contracts and it is not checked if the all-in payment actually covers all overtime. important to set oneself boundries in particular for comitted staff members who feel responsible for the organisation.
career steps may be possible if your superior leaves (high staff fluctuations). further training is mostly unheared of.
depends on the job (senior salaries are attactive but junior salaries are generally not); tax-free income is an asset - but most salaries are all-in and do not necesarrily cover all overtime worked. possibilities for salary increases are arbitrary so think well what you accept.
depends on the team, but complaints about mobbing, bossing and unfair treatment are increasing
there aren't many older colleagues
depends on the team, but treatment by superiors is one of the reasons for high staff fluctuation
the VIC is an old, outdated office building with bad ventilation and lightening; some offices are very small and meeting rooms are lacking. IT infrastructure is comparable to other non-profits (not IOs). Don't expect a laptop or cell phone unless you apply for a management position.
depending on the position - potentially interesting but not granted; work may involve many administrative tasks which are sometimes redundant