2 Bewertungen von Bewerbern
Score-Details
2 Bewerber haben diesen Arbeitgeber mit durchschnittlich 1,5 Punkten auf einer Skala von 1 bis 5 bewertet.
Ihr Unternehmen?
Jetzt Profil vervollständigenKein Logo hinterlegt
kununu Score: 1,5
Authentische Bewertungen für eine bessere Arbeitswelt
Alle Bewertungen durchlaufen den gleichen Prüfprozess - egal, ob sie positiv oder negativ sind. Im Zweifel werden Bewertende gebeten, einen Nachweis über ihr Arbeitsverhältnis zu erbringen.
Lange Bearbeitungzeit für standardisierte Absage von einer no-reply-Adresse am Samstag Abend.
Bewerber/inHat sich 2025 als Product Manager beworben und eine Absage erhalten.
Verbesserungsvorschläge
Mehr Wertschätzung für den Bewerber.
Zufriedenstellende Reaktion
Erwartbarkeit des Prozesses
Schnelle Antwort
HilfreichHilfreich?ZustimmenZustimmen?MeldenTeilen
Bad experience (the interview was in English as per interviewers wish)
Bewerber/inHat sich 2019 als .NET Developer beworben und eine Absage erhalten.
Verbesserungsvorschläge
I have applied online and I was recruited.
The first interview was with the CTO ... okay... He had very bad energy, as himself told me, and he explained why do I see toys in the background, because he took refuge on his child bedroom so he could get a better one. I don't think that helped much. We had a contradictive discussion about Apaleo, he told me that what I know is not true (they are not working with legacy code), and that I am confusing it with another company. According to their own website at that time I was right, I checked after the interview. Then I had a codding chanllenge (reverting a list, and write unt tests for it). I have completed it, but I have seen that he was utterly interested in the fact that it worked, and not my PRESENTATION skills ... ( I found this wierd because that is why it is called in German VORSTELLUNGEN - sgespräch ....)
As I have said the coddling challenge above worked, so I have got the honor to get the next interview with the person X. The person Y showed up using the persons X skype accound, and preteded to be X. Of course, he did not explayied everything. Hoe do I know that Y was no X? Read the "Fragen" section.
Bewerbungsfragen
- Nothing. I was left with the impression that they are looking for a high precision gun that fires code, not a human.
- So as I've said, I knew the intrviewrs name, and like any esponsible candidate I knew who was X. I did after the second interview some reserach to find out who is Y. He was no programmer at all. He shared a powerpoint with some C# and OOP interview questions from the web. To one of them the answers were all wrong, I have explained why, but we was continously asking "so which answer do you chose?". Another word thah we he was using freqenty was "ok".
- I have had a demo prepared to show him that protobuff is fater that JSON, he told me to argumentate. I told him that that's what the demo does, a compariosn and I wanted to show him, but he did not wanted to, he was expecting an verbal argumentation instead. Some talk insted of some work ... hm...
- I did not qualify furtherer, and I now am gald that happed that way, even that bakc then I was in a sort of a desperate situation.
Erklärung der weiteren Schritte
Professionalität des Gesprächs
Zufriedenstellende Reaktion
Wertschätzende Behandlung
Vollständigkeit der Infos
Erwartbarkeit des Prozesses
Zeitgerechte Zu- oder Absage
Angenehme Atmosphäre
Schnelle Antwort
HilfreichHilfreich?ZustimmenZustimmen?MeldenTeilen