5 Bewertungen von Mitarbeitern
5 Mitarbeiter haben diesen Arbeitgeber mit durchschnittlich 4,1 Punkten auf einer Skala von 1 bis 5 bewertet.
3 dieser Mitarbeiter haben den Arbeitgeber in ihrer Bewertung weiterempfohlen.
Ihr Unternehmen?
Jetzt Profil einrichten5 Mitarbeiter haben diesen Arbeitgeber mit durchschnittlich 4,1 Punkten auf einer Skala von 1 bis 5 bewertet.
3 dieser Mitarbeiter haben den Arbeitgeber in ihrer Bewertung weiterempfohlen.
Alle Bewertungen durchlaufen den gleichen Prüfprozess - egal, ob sie positiv oder negativ sind. Im Zweifel werden Bewertende gebeten, einen Nachweis über ihr Arbeitsverhältnis zu erbringen.
Almost everybody is nice actually
Too many layers of management and freshmen / student work force. Things are not getting done because responsibilities are unclear and hierarchy is preventing productive collaboration. Teamleaders wanting to do be involved, participating in everything instead of empowering professionals on the lower levels. (Boxtickers hopping from meeting to meeting) There are more modern management strategies out there. Just be open to look for them. This is taught everywhere nowadays.
So, the previous review was cleary written by HR fantasizing a far distant vision rather than reality. Here are some suggestions:
- onboarding 1, 2, 6 months feedback round
- regular feedback meetings
- less top down decisions but involving lower levels
- allow the employee to be more productive and succesful by better planning and organizing
- don't promote people with toxic behaviour
- sanction team saboteurs
- don't let some people earn double of what others are earning
- company exit feedback meeting (learn from mistakes)
Startup, so nobody knows it yet.
Honestly there is no chance of an internal career. You can teach yourself things when time allows it. This may help leaving the company more qualified.
above the collective labor agreement but also an all-in contract. So not clear if actually good. Huge salary differences between c-level and "work-force"
A bit chaotic and no clear leadership / responsibility.
Too many wanna-be managers coordinating external freelancers.
Flat hierarchy in the sense of: nobody tells you what to do.
Also, not even middle management agrees with decision from top level
yes, theoretically
Flat hierarchy, openness, team involvement in management decisions, location
A welcoming and supportive state of work: embracing a positive family atmosphere
In the company is maintained a work-life balance, is valued the well-being of its team members by providing various initiatives, such as flexible working hours, team events, pizza at lunch. Overall is the positive atmosphere.
In the company there is a double sides discussion at the end of the year with your manager who offers to expose you on how to work or ideas for implementation, also here the professional development of the team member is planned with the list of courses you intend to attend and which is approved by management.
The management is open to effective proposals and their door is always open. We drink coffee, have lunch together and openly discuss any questions
Managers recognize team members' efforts and celebrate achievements together.
There is always room for something more, even if wages are above average market levels :)
Location
Some of the superiors are interested in the technical but not in the more human aspects.
There is no feedback culture, so employees do not dare to say what they really think.
At my time on boarding process didn't have a 1, 6 and 12 months meeting and the company didn't have a yearly appraisal.
Improve good atmosphere, honest and transparent communication, and chances to develop, like training paid by the company.