Basierend auf Daten aus 46 Bewertungen schätzen Mitarbeiter bei Oerlikon Schweiz die Unternehmenskultur als eher traditionell ein, während der Branchendurchschnitt zwischen traditionell und modern liegt. Die Zufriedenheit mit der Unternehmenskultur beträgt 3,0 Punkte auf einer Skala von 1 bis 5 basierend auf 99 Bewertungen.
Nutze deine Stimme und verrate uns, wie die Unternehmenskultur deines Arbeitgebers wirklich aussieht.
Die Unternehmenskultur kann in vier wichtige Dimensionen eingeteilt werden: Work-Life-Balance, Zusammenarbeit, Führung und strategische Ausrichtung. Jede dieser Dimensionen hat ihren eigenen Maßstab zwischen traditionell und modern.
46 User haben eine Kulturbewertung abgegeben. Diese Faktoren wurden am häufigsten ausgewählt, um die Unternehmenskultur zu beschreiben.
FührungTraditionell
FührungTraditionell
Strategische RichtungTraditionell
Umgang miteinanderTraditionell
Umgang miteinanderModern
Work-Life BalanceTraditionell
Hast du gewusst, dass es 6 Fragen zur Unternehmenskultur gibt, wenn du einen Arbeitgeber auf kununu bewertest? Hier sind die neuesten dieser Kommentare.
Some technical improvement with virtual town halls and a tad more transparency, also by improved content. Management meetings are dishonest theater shows that cost fortunes while simple tasks and also some critical projects are not supported due to cost control.
It suffers in this atmosphere of fear. People keep their heads down. Every single employee seems to search for a way out. Private discussions are tainted by massive frustration.
In many departments line management keeps quiet during after hours and weekends which is good. Working from home rule: 1.5 days/week. People don't care though, it's not enforced.
Middle to upper management have evolved (or were hired to fit accordingly) to exclusively execute what they are told. There is no challenge, no fruitful collaborative struggle for better and common ideas and solutions. Top management word is law. Period. "Hire paid opinion" is the only rule and management behavior here.
Could be interesting if people were not buried that much under way too many tasks from positions that were cut, not replaced and/or ridiculously understaffed to begin with. It's the story of the lumberjack that is given no time and opportunity to sharpen the axe. Also, there is a lot of management arrogance towards experienced staff. They are not invited to strategize or conceptualize (also there is never time for it) and if someone takes extra effort there ideas are ignored.
Stressed-out employees live in constant fear to be axed. Many great people leave as they are buried in 4-5 full time jobs worth of work.
Constant resource reduction for years by simultaneously adding tasks and projects onto the pile. Management is not interested to entertain resource considerations. Currently it looks like HQ will be drastically reduced and everything is offshored that does not directly support top management.