50 Bewertungen von Mitarbeitern
50 Mitarbeiter haben diesen Arbeitgeber mit durchschnittlich 4,2 Punkten auf einer Skala von 1 bis 5 bewertet.
37 dieser Mitarbeiter haben den Arbeitgeber in ihrer Bewertung weiterempfohlen.
50 Mitarbeiter haben diesen Arbeitgeber mit durchschnittlich 4,2 Punkten auf einer Skala von 1 bis 5 bewertet.
37 dieser Mitarbeiter haben den Arbeitgeber in ihrer Bewertung weiterempfohlen.
Alle Bewertungen durchlaufen den gleichen Prüfprozess - egal, ob sie positiv oder negativ sind. Im Zweifel werden Bewertende gebeten, einen Nachweis über ihr Arbeitsverhältnis zu erbringen.
Die einzigen positiven Aspekte dieses Unternehmens sind die Mitarbeiter. Viele wunderbare Menschen, die den Arbeitsalltag erleichtern.
Dieser Arbeitgeber verspricht den Mitarbeitern das Blaue vom Himmel, weiß aber nicht, wie man mit Geld umgeht. Hinter verschlossenen Türen werden sehr schlechte Entscheidungen getroffen, ohne jegliche Transparenz und ohne die Experten im Unternehmen zu befragen. Es werden Tools gekauft, die niemand nutzt, einige Tools werden gestrichen, ohne dass Ersatz bereitgestellt wird, und natürlich werden die Mitarbeiter verantwortlich gemacht, wenn Projekte nicht weitergeführt werden können.
Das mittlere Management ist extrem inkompetent, nutzt aber seine geringe Macht, um den Mitarbeitern Angst zu machen, ihnen zu sagen, sie sollten besser kündigen, sie anzulügen und Konflikte zwischen Teams zu schüren, während Teamleiter ihre Teams nie verteidigen.
Das Unternehmen entlässt auch willkürlich Mitarbeiter ohne jede echte Erklärung und stellt dann ebenso willkürlich inkompetente Personen ein, um den Personalmangel zu beheben. Die Firma verlangt, dass du jeden Tag dein Bestes gibst und doppelt so viel arbeitest wie in jedem anderen Unternehmen, um die Dinge am Laufen zu halten, doch du wirst nie bedankt, und deine mentale Gesundheit wird zerstört.
Gar keine. Manche Mitarbeiter arbeiten noch um 23 Uhr.
Bei deiner Einstellung verspricht das Unternehmen ein jährliches Budget von 2000 € für persönliche und berufliche Entwicklung. Doch das Budget für die Weiterentwicklung wird jedes Jahr um August herum gekürzt, weil das Unternehmen kein Geld mehr hat.
Null Transparenz
Gehalt ist fair. Es gibt aber sehr große Diskrepanzen.
Die deutschen Mitarbeiter werden deutlich besser behandelt als die ausländischen.
I started off without knowing much about the EMSP (e-mobility service provider) industry, however I find it more interesting and enthusiastic. Company has offered a great extent to a diverse-d culture and I find myself fit right in. I am grateful for the team (Platform Engineering team) I am working and the lead has been nothing but an amazing leader/colleague. The dynamics within the team is outstanding and so is overall company's.
The interesting domain.
The dramatic short-termism.
The pressure to deliver immediate revenue jeopardized the work experience. The daily business, at all levels, must be on short-term target. Even if something doesn't make sense on the long run, or even damages the company, it has to be done ASAP anyway. Skilled people have to put their brain aside and deliver what required.
We had a skilled Lead Software Architect, who was leading the IT to a more scalable and stable architecture, but they let him go without a plausible explanation or a replacement.
Outside: End customers usually choose competitors because of the high prices of the DCS. Partners are chronically angry because projects get delivered with big delay.
Inside: after the layoff of external and internal employees, despite a future-proof industry, the image can't be good.
Good, but in case of important failures, which happens not rarely, you have to work also at night until things get right again.
But if you don't invest in system quality, that's what you get.
There is a yearly budget that usually gets withdrawn in the second half of the year because of cuts to the main budget.
Salary increases has been reduced to the minimum due to the financial situation. The problem is that the company pays high salaries for some people in high positions that is not clear how the bring the company forward. They are only about the internal processes of the company, without actually contributing to projects. A whole well-payed layer is considered to be useless by most of the operative people, and this hurts when your salary increase request gets rejected because of budget shortage.
Good, the business is about EV-charging.
The company has very capable employees, as mentioned before, but also others that I don't understand what they do the whole day. The are some that simply take part at some remote meetings, the camera is turned off and they don't say a word. If you ask them about anything concerning the topic, they show that they simply didn't listen. And they don't even deliver any other kind of work that they could have possibly done during that time.
There is nothing to say here neither.
Unfortunately, managers don't have the technical skills to really assess what's going on. They have to rely on explanations given by someone else and on the base of that they form their own opinion.
They also don't have much leeway in decision-making, as the race to break even is the only criterion.
Good office, also because they improved the equipment last year. Sometimes it gets too full because of the rule 3d/w in the office.
The weekly all-hands is similar to a war bulletin and contributes to exasperation.
Nothing to say.
No room for the real improvements that the company would need to gain a better position on the market. Just profit-making features in a quick'n'dirty way at cost of the system architecture, continuously increasing the tech debts.
Collaboration, Innovation, freedom to create your own thought and the support given to back you up
Changed a lot in the past years. Too many different people, Open Office is too noisy with over 60 people in Berlin and Munich. Too many meetings
You can Bring your dog, Home Office is allowed
If it weren't for the nice people and the good salary, many employees would leave the company faster.
COO should be changed. Does not pay attention to the company's money. Just think of his image. Always wants to do expensive parties., even though there is no cash.
Too many meetings, noisy offices
Management provides information to employees on a regular basis
A lot of topics, too many projects, no focus
- salary and benefits
- cool colleagues
- team events
- promising industry
- frequent updates from management
- IT and tools (meeting equipment, possibility to choose the laptop the person prefers, switch to Google products (or at least to Google Meet/Slack))
Interesting tasks.
Inexperienced leaders and departments constantly blaming each other. No togetherness
Growth talks.
Leadership training
Feedback culture.
Cut costs and focus on what matters. Have a clear goal and priorities what is the short term goal and long term vision.
High stress, overload of tasks and projects. High employee fluctuation.
After a point no more progression. No feedback talks, growth talks. CC lead not showing up to 1:1s…
Lower than market average.
Not answering each others emails, questions. People ghosting and ignoring each other.
Inexperienced, clueless leadership.
Departments blaming each other, gossiping behind each other. Heavy Micro management on CC level, no E2E responsibilities. Dark age systems and tools to work with.
Great colleague, great culture, good tech stack.
It would be better to see a bit more fine-grained approach. Not changing everything every year would also be a better idea. Please continue with the topics which people are interested in.
Generally, working conditions are great but the issue of dealing with the incompetent lead is an issue you might want to review.
Great place to work. Everyone is helpful.
Working pressure is quite high in some teams but it's expected since a lot of topics are ongoing
Generally, colleagues are very nice but if you have to work with certain lead is quite difficult
open communication
- Mitarbeiter freundlich
- Mitarbeiter Benefits
- Mitarbeiter Umgang
- Mitarbeiter Fürsorglich
- die Kollege/innen
- die Möglichkeiten
Aktuell würde ich nichts verändern.
sauberes Office, tolle Kollege/innen, Essen und Getränke Angebote
es findet alles auf Augenhöhe statt, jeder duzt sich, super angenehm
I find the working atmosphere very pleasant. The company is quite open, collaboration and cooperation are encouraged. In this environment, it is essential to like to work across departmental boundaries. The company is relatively young, but complex, so openness is very important.
E-mobility is a growth market and an exciting environment.
It depends on the position and department, and when fixed timelines have to be met, it can be a lot. But I am firmly convinced that with clear agreements, clear roles and responsibilities, things can be improved. For me personally, it fits and I have had completely different experiences in other start-ups.
Certainly depending on the area you work in how big your career chances are, but the company gives each employee a development budget, there are performance talks and career plans are discussed. The company is very committed to this and to improve this even further. Also i strongly believe that with the right attitude, commitment and work there are a lot of opportunities.
Certainly depending on position, role and department. I compare this with other companies I have worked for and the salaries here are higher across the board and above the average. Not only for me but also for the team i am responsible.
In none of my previous companies was there so much discussion about sustainability. Can it be improved, certainly, but overall the company takes it very seriously and there is a very vocal part of the staff that demands and support it.
In quite a short time I have been able to build up some good trusting relationships. As in any company, there are colleagues who are easier to work with and colleagues who are more difficult. Nevertheless, so far I have only had good experiences for the most part. There is a positive atmosphere and everyone tries to help each other. Due to the growth and an expected fluctuation in a scale-up, there is always a relatively high influx of new colleagues.
Talent or experience beats the birth certificate.
On the one hand, I am assessing the relationship between me and my supervisor, which is impeccable. I can understand some of the general complaints about leadership in this company but i think it is important to also think about the situation we are in. The management has to steer a complex team with complex tasks in a growing market and bring it forward. That is highly demanding and it also leads to the fact that not everything always runs 100% smoothly. There is no simple blueprint and you notice here and there that the leadership is struggling to find the answers. On the middle management level we have quite a lot of inexperienced leaders but the company is investing heavily in a leadership journey to improve there.
Details can always be improved, but overall totally fine.
Compared to previous companies I have worked for, communication is very important here. There is always an attempt to inform all employees comprehensively about the topics. However, this sometimes means that too much information is shared, information overflow. This needs to be better balanced.
Diversity in the company is present and encouraged, but few women in leadership positions.
It's a growth market and we're in the scaling phase, it's incredibly varied and you have to be up for it and you have to know what you're getting into. Not all the processes are in place or flawless here, but we are working on developing those processes right now. It's very exciting, but also demanding, and you have to be willing to put your heart and soul into it.
So verdient kununu Geld.