3 Bewertungen von Bewerbern
3 Bewerber haben diesen Arbeitgeber mit durchschnittlich 2,2 Punkten auf einer Skala von 1 bis 5 bewertet.
Ihr Unternehmen?
Jetzt Profil vervollständigen3 Bewerber haben diesen Arbeitgeber mit durchschnittlich 2,2 Punkten auf einer Skala von 1 bis 5 bewertet.
Alle Bewertungen durchlaufen den gleichen Prüfprozess - egal, ob sie positiv oder negativ sind. Im Zweifel werden Bewertende gebeten, einen Nachweis über ihr Arbeitsverhältnis zu erbringen.
After my application, the HR approached me to ask salary expectation straight away. Post my response, they sent me a coding challenge. Feedback was positive and they were impressed by my solution. I was then invited to a technical discussion with a Senior resource and an Android developer. The senior resource introduced himself but did not let his colleague introduce himself. I felt weird. During the technical discussion, I was asked a few questions related to the coding challenge. The interviewer was clarifying his doubts more than evaluating my knowledge. The Android guy asked me a simple programming question which was really easy to solve. The interview finished quicker than the schedule. I asked various questions related to their coding style and practices. They came out people with less knowledge.
In two days I received a rejection and upon asking feedback I did not receive any reply.
It seems like they don't have a budget to hire knowledgeable people and try to find someone who they could easily bend for less salary.
Improve transparency and have more respect of candidates time.
If a candidate implements a technical task he should receive technical report on where he did wrong so he can improve.
You just give a generic answer "you didn't match" and that's all. That is an absolute no-go!
So WHY I did not match I still wait for an answer?
They should hire a better HR or Proffesional recruiter