Ihr Unternehmen?
Jetzt Profil vervollständigenBasierend auf Daten aus 14 Bewertungen schätzen Mitarbeiter bei LEADBACKER die Unternehmenskultur als modern ein, während der Branchendurchschnitt leicht in Richtung modern tendiert. Die Zufriedenheit mit der Unternehmenskultur beträgt 3,5 Punkte auf einer Skala von 1 bis 5 basierend auf 17 Bewertungen.
Nutze deine Stimme und verrate uns, wie die Unternehmenskultur deines Arbeitgebers wirklich aussieht.
Die Unternehmenskultur kann in vier wichtige Dimensionen eingeteilt werden: Work-Life-Balance, Zusammenarbeit, Führung und strategische Ausrichtung. Jede dieser Dimensionen hat ihren eigenen Maßstab zwischen traditionell und modern.
Wir geben Arbeitgebern die Möglichkeit ihre Unternehmenskultur näher zu beschreiben, indem eine oder zwei von uns definierte Fragen beantwortet werden können.
Wertschätzende Feedback- und Lernkultur
14 User haben eine Kulturbewertung abgegeben. Diese Faktoren wurden am häufigsten ausgewählt, um die Unternehmenskultur zu beschreiben.
Umgang miteinanderModern
Umgang miteinanderModern
FührungTraditionell
Umgang miteinanderModern
Umgang miteinanderModern
Hast du gewusst, dass es 6 Fragen zur Unternehmenskultur gibt, wenn du einen Arbeitgeber auf kununu bewertest? Hier sind die neuesten dieser Kommentare.
We had a fantastic team work, where everyone supported each other and worked collaboratively. The positive atmosphere made it easy to share ideas, ask for help, and tackle challenges together.
I worked part-time at this company, and initially, I struggled with maintaining a good work-life balance. I often received emails outside of my working hours or on weekends, and there were times when I had difficulty balancing work with my studies. On some occasions, I was expected to be reachable at work during university lectures, which created additional stress. However, once I set clear boundaries and defined my working hours, I began to ignore emails outside of those times, which helped me manage my responsibilities more effectively. I think this solution was fine for me and also for everyone else.
In my experience, my supervisor was respectful and supportive, always willing to offer guidance and help when needed, both for work-related tasks and study-related issues. For example, it was no problem to receive help with my master’s thesis application through a letter of recommendation, which I greatly appreciated. However, while I personally didn’t face significant issues, I was aware that some of my colleagues did, and this was always in the back of my mind.
In general, I enjoyed the tasks assigned to me and appreciated the opportunity to learn a lot. However, there were instances where I encountered difficulties due to a lack of explanation for certain tasks. Many tasks were approached through a "learning by doing" method, which sometimes left gaps in understanding. Additionally, I handled a significant amount of back-office tasks as well as marketing duties. Over time, as tasks from former colleagues were reassigned to me and my own workload increased, it became challenging to maintain high quality across all responsibilities. The growing volume of work made it difficult to complete everything to the best of my ability.
lauter regeln, die gegen das gesetz verstoßen, extreme kontrolle, keine weihnachtsmeetings um geld zu sparen, einfach nicht gut. kein büro, nur 1 raum in untermiete
One area where I struggled was communication. At some times, I felt that my supervisor was unclear in communicating expectations, which led to delays in my work. Additionally, it often took a long time to receive responses, and I occasionally had to ask multiple times before getting an answer if I even got one. This lack of timely communication made it difficult to work efficiently.