16 Bewertungen von Mitarbeitern
16 Mitarbeiter haben diesen Arbeitgeber mit durchschnittlich 3,6 Punkten auf einer Skala von 1 bis 5 bewertet.
11 dieser Mitarbeiter haben den Arbeitgeber in ihrer Bewertung weiterempfohlen.
Ihr Unternehmen?
Jetzt Profil vervollständigen16 Mitarbeiter haben diesen Arbeitgeber mit durchschnittlich 3,6 Punkten auf einer Skala von 1 bis 5 bewertet.
11 dieser Mitarbeiter haben den Arbeitgeber in ihrer Bewertung weiterempfohlen.
Alle Bewertungen durchlaufen den gleichen Prüfprozess - egal, ob sie positiv oder negativ sind. Im Zweifel werden Bewertende gebeten, einen Nachweis über ihr Arbeitsverhältnis zu erbringen.
Sehr nette Vorgesetzten und sehr schnelles Feedback und Hilfe
Manchmal zu selbstständig
The atmosphere in the office is the best part. The people are nice and easy-going and always ready to help. I never saw toxic comments towards someone.
No overtimes, no absurd rules, no mindfck with micromanagement. You can always negotiate for a small private leave or excuse.
Raising awareness and participating in the charity events in place
Put it simply - colleagues are open and polite people, that respect you and your efforts.
Looks like the ownership is appreciated here. You can return your feedback suggest something, and take the responsibility for pushing things forward. The business guys listen to the opinions of engineers, but quite frequently the market situation dictates the agenda.
Comfortable nice office, nothing special and nothing to complain
The 1-2-1s are practiced regularly and I could always return even non-complimentary feedback and seen it's considered. The communication between the teams is short and direct and one can always ask anyone on the matter. Sometimes one can feel the lack of of short-term focus.
On the engineering side sometimes feels a lack of senior expertise.
Compensation is on the good level, but let's be honest - could be higher for the Berlin. The education budget is in place as well as partial transport reimbursement.
There are definitely challenges on the tech side - some legacy accumulated that needs attention. Everyone is welcome to bring something to the table, but it won't be an easy journey. Also new stories emerge an should be caught. But since it's mostly about fintech - there is no "save the world" level tasks.
The atmosphere among colleagues is collaborative and supportive.
Among colleagues we have lots of moments of sharing knowledge.
There is always an encouragement to think outside the box and bring new ideas to the table.
As a Team, we do organize different initiative outside work for bonding the Team - recently we were in Spree-wald doing kayak and we spent together a nice day.
I would love to have 3 days at home rather that 2 but this is my personal view.
Communication - While there are regular meetings, sometimes important information gets lost or not everyone is on the same page
Home-Office
Schlechte Kommunikation, Ungleichheit bei den Gehältern, keine Struktur
- Some nice people, helpful.
- Some very talented people.
- Nice challenges to solve. The tech lead is open to new ideas.
- Blaming interns for everything.
- Blaming the people who are trying new things.
- No job security.
- People take on tasks and get "bored" of them when they go beyond a couple of days. Instead of focusing on completing the marathon, the focus is on moving Jira cards from one swim lane to another.
- No actions are taken against bad actors who antagonize others.
- Too much favouritism.
Pay attention to the multiple complaints that are raised against the same individuals. There's no reason for people to lie, most of them have their personal lives and don't want to divulge in the murky waters of unnecessary office politics - but just want to focus on having a nicer environment so their blood pressure readings don't boil over.
- Tech leadership needs to identify their strengths and weaknesses and act accordingly. Promote the right people, applaud the right people, and hire the right people - you will have happy engineers.
- To the tech leadership: Take note when phrases like "This won't work", or "This has been working for the last X years" are said without doing proper research.
- Remove underperforming elements who keep antagonizing good performers with their daily shenanigans. Anyone with an ounce of self-worth is going to leave if these people keep up their unprofessional antics.
Some people go around like they own the place - asking people to shush rudely, committing code copied from AI bots, and pointing fingers at interns and colleagues without reason, while contributing negatively - both in terms of work and the mental health of others. Basic things like enabling pre-commit hooks or linting are met with rude statements. There's no scope to grow as long as these people are present.
Funnily, on the other hand, these people are very nice to the C-levels and seniors so that they can paint a fake picture of their worth and keep their positions safe.
Not great. Too many people have been laid off. Unless they fix the cultural issues that numerous people have raised, nothing will change.
Work-wise: balanced - but the mental stress inflicted by the aforementioned toxic elements spills over to your personal life as well.
Work distribution is - simply put: unfair. Some are stuck with long-running complex tasks, and some spend a week writing a simple Nginx Dockerfile.
Too many layoffs to chill and focus on career building.
Lower than the market, random compensation - doesn't reflect performance.
Good initiatives (up until December)
There's no point in trying to form a team to solve a common problem. If you try to review someone's code, or peer program, or suggest a better approach, you will be met with stubborn messages. Better to work alone, actually you can get more things done that way.
When I was working with an intern, we discussed a lot of technical points(sometimes a bit loudly to our discredit, well what can you expect in a full office? The only other option is to go downstairs, but we need our screens as well), but we were asked to keep quiet or given unsolicited advice like "only one person should work on one task".
There's no point in having 3-day work weeks if you are going to discourage people from having technical discussions in the office.
No issues here
From a tech perspective, nothing to complain about the leads, but there's very little visibility. Even after numerous complaints, there are very few steps that are taken to resolve the issues. Somewhat disconnected and out of touch with a sprinkle of favouritism.
Bad. Toxic people ruin the environment. Stressful to work in.
There's good documentation and proper communication channels - but sometimes lots of contradicting information. But ok overall.
Questionable. The salaries are not standard, your contributions don't reflect your compensation. This begs the question, is there another reason behind the unfair pay?
Plethora of things to work on, but lacks the engineering mindset to pursue some fun ideas.
Not all apples are bad. I did have the misfortune of meeting a few good people who got caught in this dumpster of a company. Talented individuals who, under better circumstances, could shine like stars. But even their light was dimmed by the overwhelming darkness of Prestatech
* First off, the management couldn't manage a lemonade stand. They were so far removed from the day-to-day operations that they might as well have been on another planet. Decisions? Ha! Good luck getting any sort of direction or leadership from these clueless individuals. They were too busy playing office politics to care about actually managing anything.
* Code quality: It's abysmal. I've seen better code written by high school students learning programming for the first time. The software is a tangled mess of spaghetti code that's about as maintainable as a sandcastle in a hurricane. And do we have code reviews to catch these issues? Nope. Not a chance. It's like a free-for-all where developers can push out garbage code with zero accountability.
* Speaking of accountability, there's none of that at Prestatech. Developers here have a remarkable talent for dodging responsibility. Need someone to blame for a bug? Just point fingers in any direction, and you'll hit someone who's eager to deflect. It's a toxic game of hot potato where nobody wants to be left holding the bag.
Best way of action: fire all the C suite, rebuild a new team of professional and let them manage themselves.
Ideal for aspiring pseudo-politicians.
The stupidity haunts you even after the work hour.
3 teams in the company act like 3 different companies. Amazing.
It will be my pleasure to put -1 here. 0 people skills.
You should know how a daily laborer communicates with his master.
I will say yes if someone can show where they use SOLID and SDLC at least.
I admire my company for its work-life balance, global work-from-anywhere policy (20 days) that give you the possibility to go back to your Country and working while staying with your family, flexibility, and HR dedication to constant improvement, creating a very confortable work environment. We are working on interesting projects and it is a great learning curve for me.
Not sure
Not sure
Supportive and inclusive work environment
Opportunities for professional growth
Engaging and challenging projects
Emphasis on work-life balance
Collaborative and innovative culture
None that I can think of
Currently at WeWork which is not the greatest coffee.
So verdient kununu Geld.