150 Mitarbeiter haben diesen Arbeitgeber mit durchschnittlich 3,8 Punkten auf einer Skala von 1 bis 5 bewertet.
108 Mitarbeiter haben den Arbeitgeber in ihren Bewertungen weiterempfohlen. Der Arbeitgeber wurde in 41 Bewertungen nicht weiterempfohlen.
Alle Bewertungen durchlaufen den gleichen Prüfprozess - egal, ob sie positiv oder negativ sind. Im Zweifel werden Bewertende gebeten, einen Nachweis über ihr Arbeitsverhältnis zu erbringen.
i get acknowledged by my manager for good work, i think everything’s fair
you get the possibility of home office, vacations are approved quickly, my manager is also flexible if i need to leave earlier or come later one day
i think this really depends on the team, but i had good experiences with mine
maybe some communication lacking, but all in all it’s good
Despite recent comments that one can read here, it is a still great place to work and there is still flexibility in how one wishes to organizes their work and working hours.
It is a true, there should be some improvement when it comes to communication of major changes affecting all the employees. Often it feels like there has not been put enough thought and consideration how some things are transmitted to employees.
Could be better
Die Sozialleistungen
Leider musste ich in meinem Krankenstand erfahren, dass ich gekündigt wurde – als alleinerziehende Mutter, drei Wochen vor Weihnachten. Besonders enttäuschend empfand ich die Begründung, die meine angeblich nicht ausreichende Performance betraf, obwohl dies vor meinem Krankenstand das gegenteilige Thema war. Ich hoffe, dass in Zukunft mehr Empathie und Fairness gegenüber Mitarbeitenden gezeigt wird, insbesondere in schwierigen Lebenslagen.
Leider hat der Arbeitgeber es nicht für wichtig empfunden, seine Mitarbeiter adäquat einzuschulen. Auch nach Bitte bzw. nach Aufzeigen des fehlenden Wissens war es nicht möglich, eine produktive und qualitative Einschulung zu erhalten.
Eine reine subjektive Meinung: nicht sympathisch
Der Arbeitgeber wirkt besser als er ist.
oft weit über die durchschnittliche Arbeitszeit hinaus weiterhin Arbeit, unentgeldlich an Feier- oder Wochenendtagen, sowie Abends
Hier gibt es laufend Angebote, diese sind allerdings mit dem Arbeitspensum schwer vereinbarbar.
Das Gehalt ist der Postion an sich fair gegenüber.
Die Firma verleiht E-Autos und E-Scooter.
Aufgrund von Grüppchen- und Abteilungen nur innerhalb der Gruppe ein Zusammenhalt.
Kann ich keine Aussage dazu machen
kein Verhalten, an dem man sich ein Beispiel nehmen sollte.
Die Beschaffung von Informationen stellt sich in jeder Lage als Herausforderung dar.
Zeigt man ein Problem auf, wird man im schlechtesten Fall vom Vorgesetzten gemobbt oder erniedrigt.
Innerhalb des Teams wäre diese verbesserungswürdig
Zusammenarbeit mit externen Kunden war interessant
It's quite concerning. Decisions are being made without any clear justification, and when people seek clarification, the intranet pages are locked and comments are disabled. Many are starting to suspect that the company is planning layoffs to cut costs. It seems like the focus is on keeping those who don’t voice their concerns rather than retaining the best talent.
No!
If people aren't treated equally, how can they effectively work together?
Older colleagues?
The working conditions are quite poor. It's hard to believe that a company with such significant profits continues to complain about high personnel costs. It almost feels like they expect us to work for free just to boost their profits even more!
It seems a bit unfair that some people are required to come into the office while others have received exceptions without clear reasons. It would be great to have more consistency and transparency in how these decisions are made.
Only minimum. If you don't get along with your boss, you probably won't get a raise. It seems like some people get more opportunities than others.
It's particularly unfair for those working from Austria to be required to come into the office three days a week, while colleagues employed in Austria and working from home in Czechia only need to come in once a week. It’s even more concerning that this inconsistency includes individuals in higher positions, which means that they are receiving a better treatment in terms of work conditions.
I like the fact that I can eat fresh and hot food every day and that there is a fitness room in the company to help me with my health. The fact that there is a company doctor is also very good. I've also often borrowed a car and an e-bike, which I think is great that the company provides something like that
Unfortunately, there are departments that see themselves very high up and talk to the others accordingly.
Some of the colleagues are a little less friendly
I liked some of my colleagues, it was the only thing that made it ok. They also paid on time.
Back in the past, I liked working from home and work life balance. But that is gone now.
Everything else.
This company made me burnt out after couple years out of school.
I would also like to say, and I don't want to generalize, it is maybe only for my own department, the biggest raises, bonuses and promotions were given only to Austrian people and except one, only Austrian people are in lead position in my ex-department.
I also witnessed people being being treated like just numbers withing the company, by being transferred against their will to different department. (And when we spoke up about it, we were being told nobody is holding us hostage in the company and we are free to leave if we don't like it).
In my team/department the pay is/was distributed strangely. It is said it's based on the tasks and job you are doing but in reality, someone with more experience was doing much less work and not that good work and still being paid much more. But again, could be just my team/department. It could be due to our manager not even knowing our workload as mentioned before.
I know I will get a reply to my review that they value a culture of feedback and etc. But please note that I did talk to people, I did speak up about stuff that were my business and I did try to give honest feedback when leaving. However, it was not welcomed with my direct manager. When I even mentioned one thing out of these hundreds, it almost led to a fight. Because at least in my department, the only reaction to any kind of feedback that is not positive is to get mad and offended and be like 'what do you mean? that did not happen. I don't agree...'
I know this will sound like I am bashing this company, but I am honestly just sharing my experience. I do truly think that there are amazing people within this company and there is really a lot of them and if you get a chance to work with them, you will enjoy it, if you will be in luck of catching a good leader, you will have a great time in this company because they will shield you from all of this. I think me and everyone who is writing the reviews is hoping that instead of a reply to report something in some novomatic system or contact 2 business partners that are left, you will send it to the people who should read it and do something about it. Because it's repeating in every review.
- 360 feedback for the whole company
- pay more attention to who you promote, as promoting someone just cause you like them is not a good thing
- every team lead should have performance review based on reviews of their team (cause maybe if there is no one staying in the team, it's not a team problem?)
- put away the 60 % rule, cause it was done on a whim and it was absolutely not research based at all
- try to get at least 1 strong woman to the board, would be nice (please someone who is able to oppose in arguments with other board members and able to defend the employees)
- how about first remaking the office and than start some rule instead of making people eat in the lobby and by desk?
- don't use AI to write announcements to your employees
- career path for the whole company, not just the chosen departments
- give raises to people who deserve it
- don't promise something if you cannot keep your promise
When I left couple months ago, it was horrendous. In the light of the recent changes, everyone was afraid to even talk to each other, let alone with our director, as we have experienced that voicing opinion publicly will earn us a talking to.
Honestly, thanks to Novomatic it was already bad, but since there was the new addition to the leadership last November, it's going down so bad. It's going back in time in every aspect, and no decision is research based.
Now is non existent with the new rule. But even before really depended on your workload (which was not equal ever in my team at least). Flexible hours mean you can maybe plan and schedule your day how you want, but someone will always put a meeting when you are gone, or not flexible enough to change the time, so you still end up working till at least 5. The saddest part is, that it used to be couple years back really amazing.
I could write a novel about this, but I will just sum it up - they say there is a career path. There is one for maybe if I am generous 50 % of the company. Instead of creating all initiatives for progression, training, learning etc for the whole company, they just do it for small parts so there is no equality in opportunities, you can't even give feedback about your supervisor if you are not in some parts of CTO, that's why there is so much bad management, cause no one is gathering feedback. You have your own learning budget, but sometimes it's being used by team activities, you cannot also choose everything, there are certain preapproved stuff.
Benefits are not bad, but they are now being policed as well, e.g. ability to take 2 sick days without doctor's note. For the salary - in my team/department - raises were done by favoritism, as well as bonuses. I also got promised a lot of it and in reality, the budget went to someone else.
There was a really great employee who had a lot of initiatives, great mindset, energy and was really into it. Well he was let go. And so were all the plans he had and then there was no talk about well being, mental health, etc.
I have to put 1 star, as I don't want this company to have even 1 extra star, because they don't deserve it, but this is the only thing that kept me sane. Having someone else witness the crazy things happening and being able to discuss it with them, is the only reason I am not crazy (which is not a joke, as I was extremely burnt out).
Depends on the team, but honestly everything in this company is based on favoritism, so doesn't matter age or how long you are in the company.
Well, this again depends on in which team and department you are. I know there are couple of really great supervisors at Greentube. Not in my case unfortunately. My manager was really moody, telling us to do something, then saying that we did it wrong (even though made exactly like being told), cancelling meetings, and sometimes not even showing up and not apologizing, just pretending that it did not happen and that we were not just waiting an hour for them. Being so distracted that they don't know what is the team let alone individuals working on and assigning us stuff and taking extra from other locations to give us, even when all of us had already more than enough. Also sometimes, not often, maybe once every 2-3 months randomly snapping during team meeting at someone for no reason at all. But I would say the worst was the favoritism.
Absolutely not enough meeting rooms and facilities for meetings, it was really crowded in the canteen before the 60% rule, but now I heard people had to go eat by their desks, or just find a table somewhere in the company.
As you can read in previous reviews, communication is so bad, that having none at all would be better. Anything that is communicated to employees and it's not written by marketing department (as I suppose they still have some sense) is written by AI. And I am 100 % sure. Communication from the board is even worse, if there is any actually. Because from regular 4x a year town hall meetings, we went to 0-1x per year. Nobody knows what is the strategy, as it looks like there is none, just impulsive decisions.
There are 6 men on the board of the company, not one woman. In upper leadership, again, you need to really try to find a woman. It's very sad and I think that it is also a reason why so many topics are being overlooked, like mental health, etc.
Sometimes yes, but sometimes they make you work on a project for couple of months, just to tell you that there is actually no budget (even thought you kept asking about budget and there was some). Meaningless researches on stuff only to go with the option the board chose months ago... Just wasting your time.
Colleagues, Salary
1.) New 60% Rule
2.) Nobody listens to what people think
3.) A lot of weird unreasonable business decisions have been made without reasoning e.g.: Acquiring of companies that we don't really need (cost more money than they bring value)
1.) One Mandatory Office Day -> Rest free to chose
2.) Value peoples opinion, make them feel heard
3.) Don't do anything someone above says "just because"
There used to be a nice working culture in this company where people talk to each other before they just apply some changes. But now out of nowhere after record breaking figures during and after corona people are forced to come back to the office for 60% of the time, worth mentioning that there is several special exceptions for people who really need it (which I find positive) but there is also exceptions for people who don't really need it.
Overall I think this would be way better if there is like 1 fixed day where people come and the rest is free to choose.
If you compare this to any other IT company, we are going back in time.
Everything on social media feels very fake.
This changed drastically with the "60% in office change", used to be very nice during and after corona until 1st of October.
I have the feeling that if you know the right people in this company you can become anything which doesn't really speak for the company.
If it wasn't for the team and my colleagues I would not be here anymore.
My direct manager is really cool and knows how to treat and manage people and work. Above him I would say it's a bit unclear what is happening, there i a lot of questionable decisions.
Used to be way better.
For the "Come back to office for 60% of the time change" there was an email sent with a link to an internal announcement and FAQs where you could comment without naming a real reason for the change, to be honest, chat-gpt would write similar reasons.
One employee started a voting where ~ 300 people voted against the change and the company did nothing about it.
One week later the COO of the company held an online call, started it very promptly without waiting for people to join, said a few meaningless words, so again no explanation. After the call there was no recording to watch, the internal announcement site was taken offline so no one could comment against it anymore and thats it.
This was enforced with no reason, not communicated properly + the office facilities are not in the shape they need to be in order to accommodate for everyone to come to the office again. Teams are across the world, everyone is in calls all day and we have a non cubical open office.
As of October 24th we still have construction work downstairs that we hear from time to time in the morning + I dont know how long it will take them to adapt the office spaces on 6 floors to work
One of the reasons I am actually still here. The company pays very well.
I would think that it's more or less even but I cant tell for sure.
Work is more or less interesting depending on if you have time to work on things that are innovative. Mostly there is work to implement new brands and do regulatory work.
Immer weniger
Immer mehr
Weg mit der 60% regel
4 tage woche
Seit man gezwungen wird ins office zu kommen sind alle müde und schlecht gelaunt
Das war mal. 3x die woche in vollen öffis Lebenszeit verschwenden
Ohne mein team wäre ich längst weg
Tja was soll man sagen
Findet nicht mehr statt
Die multikulturelle Arbeitsumgebung fand ich sehr lehrreich und bereichernd, einige Benefits und Möglichkeiten für jeden und ist sehr familienfreundlich.
Die Geschäftsleitung weiß eigentlich nichts über das interne Geschehen. Erfährt erst dann von Kündigungen durch den DN, wenn sie die Formulare unterschreiben müssen. Man sollte wissen, dass lieber mehr Geld ins Recruiting und nicht in gute Mitarbeiter gesteckt wird.
Mehr Augenmerk auf vorhandenen Führungsqualitäten unbedingt notwendig, da die Arbeitsqualität essenziell davon abhängt. Die Work-Life-Balance ist für alle wichtig, wichtig für Head-of, Teamlead und vor allem dem Mitarbeiter/Teammitglied, weil der der wichtigste Part für ein erfolgreiches Unternehmen ist.
Schönes Leben, wenn du dem Teamlead äußerlich gefällst.
Aufgrund dessen, dass das einst perfekte Team an die Wand gefahren wird, spricht auch die Mundpropaganda im Haus für sich.
Motivation und Wertschätzung praktisch nicht vorhanden
Wären eigentlich gut. Jedoch aktueller Teamlead lässt es nur bei ausgewählten Mitarbeitern zu.
Eigentlich ganz gut, weil das Gott sei Dank nicht vom Teamlead abhängt.
Ist dem aktuellen Teamlead völlig egal.
Das Team war großartig bis vor einem Jahr als es einen Teamleadwechsel gab
Man mag eigentlich nur junge unfertige Persönlichkeiten, die aufgrund dessen leicht lenkbar sind und Unsinnigkeiten stumm akzeptieren.
Genießt die Macht und lässt arbeiten. Mitarbeiter werden allein gelassen.
Wenn die schlechte Teamführung nach außen dringt, weil die Arbeitsqualität durch den Zerfall eines perfekten Teams sehr darunter leidet.
Das Teammitglied muss sich die Informationen selbst beschaffen.
Leider = 0
Wer den äußerlichem Kriterien entspricht und mental schwach ist, hat hier gute Chancen. Wer gute Arbeit leistet, aber für den Teamlead als für sich gefährlich eingestuft wird, wird gnadenlos denunziert und sogar gemobbt.
Wenn man ein bevorzugtes Teammitglied ist, darf man alles machen was man will - auch Teamlead-Aufgaben. Teamlead selbst ist nicht der Erfinder der Arbeit.
Decisions are being made without explanation for the employees. Financial results of our company do not seem to reflect well into how things evolve for us. Everyone seems to pay for the wrong decisions taken by some.
Improve the office, more meeting rooms, (much) more space in the kitchen, better coffee, better food in the restaurant
Despite things getting worse, for me, the athmosphere is still very good.
Return to office 60% of the time made work-life balance worse than before
Lots of opportunities for training, clearly a focus on L&D
People are trying
Return to office 60% of the time made work-life balance and working conditions in general worse. The office in Vienna is not ready for this. The facilities in the building are outdated, especially comparing to competitors
Communication has clearly become worse in the last 10 months, decisions are being made without explaining them to people
So verdient kununu Geld.